


Every published content under “Articles” section is subject for peer review. Published contents under “Editorial” section are not peer-reviewed.
Peer review in the journal is conducted by external reviewers. They were selected based on their expertise and latest publications in the related topics of submitted manuscripts. At least two reviewers are selected for each submission. The journal didn’t ask author(s) for recommended reviewers to avoid any misconduct in peer review process. At some point, editorial board members can also be selected as reviewers of a manuscript.
Following, type of peer review process in the journal can be summarized as follows:
Identity Transparency: Double Anonymized
Reviewer identity is not made visible to author, author identity is not made visible to reviewer, reviewer and author identity is visible to (decision-making) editor.
Reviewer Interacts with: Editor
Communication between editor and reviewer (traditional model). Also known as ‘independent review’. Identities can be anonymized or visible.
The peer review process in the journal can be described as follow:
How the Peer Review Process Works Journal of Islamic Science Integration
Mailing Address:
Editorial Office Journal of Islamic Science and Integration
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License